Validity and Reliability of the INSPIRE: Instrument Perceptions Science Inquiry and Nature of Science
DOI:
10.29303/ijcse.v2i1.936Published:
2025-05-30Issue:
Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): March 2025Keywords:
Teachers' perceptions, science scientists, nature of science, science inquiry, validity and reliabilityArticles
How to Cite
Abstract
This research discusses about validity and reliability of teachers' perceptions of scientists, natural science (science) subjects, as well as the nature of science and scientific inquiry. The research was conducted by distributing questionnaires to science teachers in various regions for two weeks, which included 81 closed questions and 23 open questions. The results of the analysis show that the instruments used are valid and reliable, with the majority of teachers having a good understanding of the nature of science and the importance of science teaching. However, there is variation in perceptions regarding the characteristics of scientists and the effectiveness of inquiry methods. These findings highlight the need for ongoing professional development for teachers to improve the quality of science education. This research succeeded in developing and testing a valid and reliable INSPIRE instrument to measure science teachers' perceptions of scientists, science subjects, the nature of science (NOS), and the nature of scientific inquiry (NOSI). The research results show that this instrument can be used as an effective evaluation tool to understand teacher perceptions, which in turn can be a basis for designing more appropriate educational interventions.
References
[1] S. Havu-Nuutinen, A. Kervinen, A. Uitto, A. Laine, A. Koliseva, L. Pyykkö, P. Impiö, and T. Aittola, "PRE-SERVICE AND IN-SERVICE TEACHERS’ EXPERIENCES OF INQUIRY-BASED PRIMARY SCIENCE TEACHING: A
COLLABORATIVE TEAM TEACHING MODEL," Journal of Baltic Science Education, 2019.
[2] K. Kurtzworth-Keen and K. Harper, "Utilizing Collaborative Teacher Inquiry to Enhance Daily Teaching Practices in K-12 Classrooms," International Journal of Teacher Education and Professional Development (IJTEPD), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 17- 29, 2021. doi: 10.4018/IJTEPD.2021010102.
[3] H. Yacoubian, "Teaching Nature of Science Through a Critical Thinking Approach," pp. 199-212, 2020. doi: 10.1007/978- 3-030-57239-6_10.
[4] A. P. Dewitasari and R. Rusmini, "Feasibility of Interactive E-LKPD Based on Nature of Science (NoS) to Train Students’ Critical Thinking Skills on Chemical Bonding Material," Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 7122–7131, 2023. doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.4436.
[5] A. Takda, B. Jadmiko, and E. Erman, "Development of INoSIT (Integration Nature of Science in Inquiry with Technology) Learning Models to Improve Science Literacy: A Preliminary studies," Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 18–31, 2022. doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v8i1.957.
[6] F. Wulandari, E. Setiyawati, and F. Su’udiyah, "An Analysis of Teacher Candidates Scientific Literacy through Nature of Science (NoS) in Inquiry-Based Learning," Journal of Physics Conference Series, vol. 1764, no. 1, p. 012102, 2021. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1764/1/012102.
[7] J. Lederman, N. Lederman, S. Bartels, J. Jiménez, K. Acosta, M. Akubo, S. Aly, M. Andrade, M. Atanasova, E. Blanquet,
R. Blonder, P. Brown, R. Cardoso, P. Castillo-Urueta, P. Chaipidech, J. Concannon, O. Dogan, H. El-Deghaidy, A. Elzorkani, T. Ferdous, N. Fukuda, E. Gaigher, L. Galvis-Solano, Q. Gao, S. Guo, Y. Gwekwerere, J. Gyllenpalm, S. Al-Lal,
C. Han-Tosunoglu, A. Hattingh, G. Holliday, X. Huang, S. Irez, J. Jiménez, G. Kay, A. Koumara, K. Kremer, P. Kuo, J. Lavonen, J. Leung, Z. Liao, M. Librea-Carden, S. Lin, C. Liu, E. Liu, S. Liu, R. Mamlok-Naaman, C. McDonald, A. Möller, M. Morales, B. Mulvey, I. Neumann, A. Neurohr, Y. Pan, P. Panjaburee, M. Penn, K. Plakitsi, É. Picholle, U. Ramnarain, Z. Raykova, C. Rundgren, S. Salonen, D. Santibáñez-Gómez, R. Schwartz, R. Sharma, N. Srisawasdi, S. Takiveikata, T. Urueta-Ortiz, K. Vitlarov, F. Voitle, and J. Wishart, "International collaborative follow-up investigation of graduating high school students’ understandings of the Nature of Scientific Inquiry: is progress Being made?," International Journal of Science Education, vol. 43, pp. 991-1016, 2021. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2021.1894500.
[8] G. Mesci, R. Schwartz, and B. Pleasants, "Enabling Factors of Preservice Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Nature of Science and Nature of Scientific Inquiry," Science & Education, vol. 29, pp. 263-297, 2020. doi: 10.1007/s11191-019-00090-w.
[9] J. P. Jiménez Pavez, N. G. Lederman, and J. S. Lederman, "Assessing the Impact of Understanding Nature of Scientific Knowledge and Nature of Scientific Inquiry on Learning about Evolution," Connecting Science Education with Cultural Heritage Proceedings of the ESERA 2023 Conference
[10] M. Rosli, N. Saleh, S. Alshammari, M. Ibrahim, A. Atan, and N. Atan, "Improving Questionnaire Reliability using Construct Reliability for Researches in Educational Technology," Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 15, pp. 109-116, 2021. doi: 10.3991/IJIM.V15I04.20199.
[11] A. E. Bozdoğan, Ü. G. Durukan, and Y. Hacıoğlu, "Middle school students’ perceptions about the scientists," Participatory Educational Research, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 95-117, 2018.
[12] S. Chen, "Development of an instrument to assess views on nature of science and attitudes toward teaching science,"
Science Education, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 803-819, 2006.
[13] B. C. Pérez and N. Díaz-Moreno, "Promoting pre-service primary teachers’ development of NOSI through specific immersion and reflection," EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 18, no. 3, p. em2089, 2022.
[14] B. J. Fraser, TOSRA: Test of Science-Related Attitudes Handbook. Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia: The Australian Council for Educational Research Limited, 1981.
[15] Ş. Yaşar dan Ş. S. Anagün, "Reliability and Validity Studies of the Science and Technology Course Scientific Attitude Scale," Journal of Turkish Science Education, vol. 6, no. 2, hal. 43-54, Agustus 2009.
Author Biographies
Prelia Dwi Amanah, University of Mataram
Thufail Mujjadid Al Qayyim, Master of Science Education Program, University of Mataram, Lombok, West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia.
Muhammad Tantawi Jauhari, Mataram University
Eka Muliati, Mataram University
Fitratunisyah, Mataram University
A Wahab Jufri, Mataram University
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Prelia Dwi Amanah, Thufail Mujjadid Al Qayyim, Muhammad Tantawi Jauhari, Eka Muliati, Fitratunisyah, A Wahab Jufri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with International Journal of Contextual Science Education (IJCSE), agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in International Journal of Contextual Science Education (IJCSE)
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
