Practicality of Causalytic Model Learning Integrated to Character Values Assisted by Go-Lab Platform to Improve Students' Problem Solving and Creative Thinking Abilities

Authors

Huraiza Mahmudah , Joni Rokhmat , Kosim , Hisbulloh Als Mustofa

DOI:

10.29303/ijcse.v1i2.575

Published:

2024-05-13

Issue:

Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): March 2024

Keywords:

Practicality, Learning Tool, Causalytic Model Integrated to Character Values, Go-Lab Platform

Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Mahmudah, H., Rokhmat, J., Kosim, & Mustofa, H. A. (2024). Practicality of Causalytic Model Learning Integrated to Character Values Assisted by Go-Lab Platform to Improve Students’ Problem Solving and Creative Thinking Abilities. International Journal of Contextual Science Education, 1(2), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.29303/ijcse.v1i2.575

Abstract

This research aims to develop a causalytic model learning integrated of character values assisted by Go-Lab platform to improve students' problem solving and creative thinking abilities. This development research procedure refers to the steps in developing a 4D model which consists of four main stages, namely defining, designing, developing and disseminating. The practicality test is carried out after the definition and design stages are completed. The practicality test instrument consists of an observation sheet on learning implementation as well as a teacher and student response questionnaire. The observers involved in filling out the observation sheet for learning implementation were 1 teacher of science and 20 students in class VIII-C at State Junior High School (SMPN) 3 Labuapi. Meanwhile, the observers involved in filling out the response questionnaire were 3 teachers of science and 20 students in class VIII-C at SMPN 3 Labuapi. Learning tools are said to be practical if the observers' assessments state that the learning tools can be applied. The results of the analysis of observations of learning implementation by teachers and students obtained an average percentage of 97.08% and 96.88% in very practical category. Meanwhile, the results of the analysis of teacher and student responses obtained an average percentage of 90.00% and 98.00% in very practical category. This shows that the learning tools developed are easy to use, easy to interpret, and provide benefits for teachers and students.

References

Tanjung, H. S., & Nababan, S. A. 2022. Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran berbasis Masalah untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah dan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa SMA Negeri 3 Kuala Kabupaten Nagan Raya. Genta Mulia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 10(2), 178-187. ISSN: 2301-6671

Warodiah, Y.N., Rokhmat, J., Zuhdi, M., Kosim., & Ayub, S. 2021. The Strategy of Student-Worksheet Design with a Causalitic-Learning Model to Improve Creative-Thinking Ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1-12. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1816/1/012047

Gunada, I. W., Sahidu, H., & Sutrio, S. 2015. Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Masalah untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar dan Sikap Ilmiah Mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi. 1(1): 38- 46. DOI: 10.29303/jpft.v1i1.233

Rokhmat, J. 2018. Model Pembelajaran Kausalitik. Mataram: Arga Puji Press.

Rokhmat, J., dkk. 2019. Fisika SMA-1a dengan Pendekatan Berpikir Kausalitik. Mataram: LITPAM.

Rokhmat, J., & Verawati, N. N. S. 2020. The causalitic learning model to increase students’ problem-solving ability. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1572, No. 1, p. 012068). IOP Publishing. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1572/1/012068

Maydiantoro, A. 2021. Research Model Development: Brief Literature Review. Jurnal Pengembangan Profesi Pendidik Indonesia, 1(2), 29-35. e-ISSN: 2776-303X

Sugiyono. 2013. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono, M. 2015. Penelitian & Pengembangan (Research and Development/R&D).Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta

Sugiyono. 2017. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. 2018. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Rochmad. 2012. Desain Model Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Kreano, 3(1), 59-72. DOI: 10.15294/kreano.v3i1.2613

Irsalina, A., & Dwiningsih, K. 2018. Analisis Kepraktisan Pengembangan Lembar Kegiatan Peserta Didik (LKPD) Berorientasi Blanded Learning Pada Materi Asam Basa. Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan Kimia, 3(3), 171-182. DOI: 10.20961/jkpk.v3i3.25648

Roliza, E., Ramadhona, R., & Rosmery, L. 2018. Praktikalitas Lembar Kerja Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Matematika Materi Statistika. Jurnal Gantang, 3(1), 41-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31629/jg.v3i1.377

Arikunto, S. 2013. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Sundayana, R. 2014. Statistika Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Fatmawati. 2016. Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Konsep Pencemaran Lingkungan menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Berdasarkan Maalah untuk SMA Kelas X. Jurnal EduSain. 4(2), 94-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23971/eds.v4i2.512

Miranti, K., Syahmani, S., & Santoso, U. T. (2021). Kepraktisan perangkat pembelajaran dengan model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing pada materi materi zat aditif dan zat adiktif. Journal of Banua Science Education, 2(1), 9-14. https://doi.org/10.20527/jbse.v2i1.61

Indah Paramita Alik, Dewi Diana Paramata, & Supartin, S. (2023). Analisis Kepraktisan Perangkat Pembelajaran Model Discovery Learning Berbantuan Media Ispring Suite pada Materi Fluida Statis. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN MIPA, 13(1), 46-53. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v13i1.821

Zakirman, Lufri, & Khairani. 2018. Factors influencing the use of lecture methods in learning activities : Teacher perspective. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 178(ICoIE 2018), 4–6.

Mahmudah, H., Rokhmat, J., & Kosim, K. 2022. Character Value-Integrated Causalitic Model Student Worksheet Development Strategy to Improve Creative Thinking Ability and Character Change. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 8(1), 30-36. DOI: 10.29303/jpft.v8i1.3389

Rahayu, C., Eliyarti, E., & Festiyed, F. (2019). Kepraktisan Perangkat Pembelajaran Berbasis Model Generative Learning dengan Pendekatan Open-ended Problem. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 7(3), 164-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v7i3.6139

Author Biographies

Huraiza Mahmudah, Universitas Mataram

Joni Rokhmat, Universitas Mataram

Kosim, Universitas Mataram

Hisbulloh Als Mustofa, Universitas Pendidikan Sultan Idris

License

Authors who publish with International Journal of Contextual Science Education (IJCSE), agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in International Journal of Contextual Science Education (IJCSE)
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).