Independent Curriculum: Correlation Between Science Process Skills and Cognitive Abilities with Students' Caring Attitudes in Junior High Schools

Authors

Hikmawati Hikmawati , Aris Doyan , Supriadi , Rohani

DOI:

10.29303/ijcse.v2i2.1023

Published:

2025-06-30

Issue:

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): June 2025

Keywords:

Independent Curriculum, science process skills, cognitive, environmental attitude

Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Hikmawati, H., Doyan, A., Supriadi, & Rohani. (2025). Independent Curriculum: Correlation Between Science Process Skills and Cognitive Abilities with Students’ Caring Attitudes in Junior High Schools. International Journal of Contextual Science Education, 2(2), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.29303/ijcse.v2i2.1023

Abstract

This study aims to explore the relationship between science process skills, cognitive abilities, and students' caring attitudes in the context of project-based learning in the Independent Curriculum era. The project implemented is the processing of plastic waste into eco-friendly bricks stools, which is also part of the Pancasila Student Profile Strengthening Program with the theme of a sustainable lifestyle. This study uses a quantitative approach with a correlational design. Data were obtained from 86 seventh grade students at SMP Negeri 16 Mataram. The research instruments included a science process skills test, a cognitive ability test, and a caring attitude questionnaire. The results of the Pearson Correlation test showed that science process skills had a significant relationship with cognitive ability (r = 0.992). The results of the Kendall's tau-b Correlation test showed that science process skills had a significant relationship with caring attitude (τb = 0.798) and caring attitude had a significant relationship with cognitive ability (τb = 0.889). In other words, it can be said that project-based learning can improve science process skills and cognitive ability while building a character of caring attitude towards the environment. Therefore, it can be concluded that the implementation of project-based learning in the Independent Curriculum, such as making stools from eco-friendly bricks, has a positive impact on developing science process skills and cognitive abilities as well as students' caring attitudes. Project-based learning can be an alternative innovative model to be implemented at various levels of education so that efforts are needed to train teachers in implementing this learning model, and support from schools and government policies to improve the sustainability of environmental-based education.

References

[1] M. Maisyaroh, B. B. Wiyono, T. Chusniyah, M. A. Adha, A. V. Valdez, and I. Lesmana, “Existence of independent learning curriculum and portrait of ideal curriculum management in laboratory schools,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1187–1196, 2024, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v18i4.21729.

[2] R. F. Tanjung, S. D. Sucipto, K. Lubis, Y. D. Suryani, and M. Minarsi, “Analysis of child development based on development psychological theory,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1091–1098, 2024, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v18i3.21769.

[3] A. S. Manurung and P. Pappachan, “The role of discovery learning in efforts to develop students’ critical thinking abilities,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 46–53, 2025, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v19i1.21788.

[4] S. Sidauruk et al., “Scientific literacy on peatland across various study programs, genders, and current domicile of university students in Borneo,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 449–459, 2025, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v19i1.21794.

[5] F. A. Ikhsan, Sumarmi, and S. Utaya, “Research based learning conservation critical land in Meru Betiri National Park Indonesia,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 169–179, 2025, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v19i1.21811.

[6] S. Fathimah, A. Tenri, S. C. Sasea, M. Marleni, and I. W. G. Suarjana, “Comparative study of social studies curriculum in scandinavian countries in developing students’ social skills,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1197–1208, 2024, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v18i4.21711.

[7] D. Yulianti and Herpratiwi, “Development of a science, environment, technology, and society-based learning module to foster critical thinking in elementary students,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1372–1384, 2024, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v18i4.21713.

[8] D. H. Marisda, N. Nurlina, M. Ma’ruf, R. Rahmawati, R. Idamayanti, and M. Akbar, “Challenges in secondary school education: profile of physics students’ critical thinking skills,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1099–1106, 2024, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v18i3.21666.

[9] X. Chen, L. Wang, X. Shao, and R. Wei, “An analysis of Chinese chemistry curriculum standards based on OECD Education 2030 Curriculum Content Mapping,” Discip. Interdiscip. Sci. Educ. Res., vol. 6, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s43031-023-00091-4.

[10] K. G. Erdyneeva, A. I. Prokopyev, N. A. Kondakchian, S. V. Semenov, A. A. Evgrafov, and A. R. Fayzullina, “A comprehensive bibliometric analysis of current trends in outdoor and informal learning for science education,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 20, no. 6, 2024, doi: 10.29333/EJMSTE/14660.

[11] İ. Delen and Ö. Y. Tüzün, “Science Education in Different Contexts: Regional and Local Differences in The Main Research Trends,” Egit. ve Bilim, vol. 49, no. 218, pp. 185–204, 2024, doi: 10.15390/EB.2024.12578.

[12] A. R. Masalimova, M. R. Zheltukhina, O. V. Sergeeva, N. N. Kosarenko, D. A. Tsomartova, and L. M. Smirnova, “Science teaching in BRICS: A systematic review of pedagogical approaches and challenges,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 20, no. 4, 2024, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/14434.

[13] Y. Wang, J. Lavonen, and K. Tirri, “Aims for learning 21st century competencies in national primary science Curricula in China and Finland,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 2081–2095, 2018, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/86363.

[14] T. H. Nguyen, H. T. Do, and A. T. Nguyen, “The natural science teacher training program meeting the demands of the new general education curriculum in Vietnam,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 2727, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2024, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2727/1/012031.

[15] Y. Zhang, W. Wang, Y. Xian, X. Wang, and J. Huang, “the Research Status of Formative Assessment in Science Education,” J. Balt. Sci. Educ., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1103–1119, 2023, doi: 10.33225/jbse/23.22.1103.

[16] Y. Y. Yeung, Y. C. Lee, and I. C. M. Lam, “Curriculum reform and restructuring of senior secondary science education in Hong Kong: Teachers’ perceptions and implications,” Asia-Pacific Forum Sci. Learn. Teach., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1–34, 2012.

[17] Asman, M. Kumaro, and M. S. Barliana, “Integration of 4Cs Skills into Learning by Using the Project Based Learning (PjBL) Model to Face the Challenges of the 21st Century,” Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Innov. Eng. Vocat. Educ. (ICIEVE 2021), vol. 651, no. Icieve 2021, pp. 88–93, 2022, doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.220305.018.

[18] R. A. Rochim, P. Prabowo, M. Budiyanto, E. Hariyono, and B. K. Prahani, “The Use of STEM-Integrated Project-based Learning Models to Improve Learning Outcomes of Junior High School Students,” in Proceedings of the Eighth Southeast Asia Design Research (SEA-DR) & the Second Science, Technology, Education, Arts, Culture, and Humanity (STEACH) International Conference (SEADR-STEACH 2021), 2022, pp. 211–218. doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.211229.034.

[19] E. Susetyarini, E. Nurohman, and H. Husamah, “Analysis of Students’ Collaborative, Communication, Critical Thinking, and Creative Abilities through Problem-Based Learning,” J. Penelit. dan Pengkaj. Ilmu Pendidik. e-Saintika, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 33–42, 2022, doi: 10.36312/esaintika.v6i1.584.

[20] A. Launuru, D. Rumahlatu, and M. N. Matdoan, “PjBL-HOTS learning model: Its application and effect on cognitive learning outcomes, critical thinking, and social attitudes,” BIOEDUPAT Pattimura J. Biol. Learn., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2021, doi: 10.30598/bioedupat.v1.i1.pp1-10.

[21] D. J. W. Sejati, W. Isnaeni, and S. Saptono, “Analysis of High Level Thinking Skills, Character and Skills of Science Process of High School Students in Project Based Learning,” J. Innov. Sci. Educ., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 183–192, 2021, [Online]. Available: http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jise

[22] Z. R. Ridlo, U. Nuha, I. W. A. Terra, and L. Afafa, “The implementation of project-based learning in STEM activity (water filtration system) in improving creative thinking skill,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1563, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1563/1/012073.

[23] D. Triana, Y. U. Anggraito, and S. Ridlo, “Effectiveness of Environmental Change Learning Tools Based on STEM-PjBL Towards 4C Skills of Students,” JISE, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 181–187, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jise

[24] S. Talib, B. S. Alias, M. E. @. E. M. Matore, and A. H. Abdullah, “Empowering STEM education through the role of principals: a systematic literature review,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 570–578, 2025, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v19i1.21889.

[25] Suhendro, D. Sugandi, and M. Ruhimat, “The Urgency of HOTS-Oriented Learning and Assessment Towards Quality of Education in Facing Indonesia Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 2030,” Proc. 5th Asian Educ. Symp. 2020 (AES 2020), vol. 566, no. Aes 2020, pp. 237–250, 2021, doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.210715.052.

[26] H. C. Le, V. H. Nguyen, and T. L. Nguyen, “Integrated STEM Approaches and Associated Outcomes of K-12 Student Learning: A Systematic Review,” Educ. Sci., vol. 13, no. 3, 2023, doi: 10.3390/educsci13030297.

[27] N. Suharsono, R. Hidayat, F. Zen, D. Rusmana, and S. Permansah, “Evaluating pedagogical approaches in business education: a comparative analysis,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 616–625, 2025, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v19i2.21819.

[28] H. Pratomo, N. Fitriyana, A. Wiyarsi, and Marfuatun, “Mapping chemistry learning difficulties of secondary school students: a cross-grade study,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 909–920, 2025, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v19i2.21826.

Author Biographies

Hikmawati Hikmawati, Universitas Mataram

Aris Doyan, Universitas Mataram

Supriadi, Universitas Mataram

Rohani, Universitas Mataram

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Hikmawati Hikmawati, Aris Doyan, Supriadi, Rohani

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with International Journal of Contextual Science Education (IJCSE), agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in International Journal of Contextual Science Education (IJCSE)
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).