AI-Driven Optimization of Pascal Programming Instruction for Undergraduate Physics Students at University of Mataram
DOI:
10.29303/ijcse.v1i3.640Published:
2024-06-30Issue:
Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): June 2024Keywords:
Computational physics education, Programming instruction, Personalized learning, Interactive tutorials, Pascal programming, Student engagement, Tailored instructional materials, Artificial intelligenceArticles
Downloads
How to Cite
Abstract
Teaching computational physics and developing programming skills remains a significant challenge for many undergraduate programs worldwide. This study presents an innovative approach implemented at the University of Mataram, Indonesia, to optimize Pascal programming instruction for physics students. Various artificial intelligence (AI) techniques were utilized to assist students in developing more complex programs. This enabled the generation of customized lesson plans with interactive tutorials, coding exercises, and simulations tailored to each student's needs. Throughout the semester, the system continuously monitored student progress and adjusted instructional materials accordingly. The analysis of Mann-Whitney test results for Computational Physics scores among Classes A, B, and C revealed no statistically significant differences between the groups, with median scores consistently at 80 and p-values exceeding 0.05. However, an examination of the theoretical section of the final examination showed an overall improvement in average scores compared to the previous year, with Class A achieving the highest mean score of 84%. Additionally, the practical programming section demonstrated increased pass rates across all three classes, with Class B achieving the highest pass rate at 92%, followed by Class A at 88% and Class C at 82%. Student feedback indicated high levels of satisfaction with the approach, citing increased engagement and motivation. The study highlights the potential of leveraging AI techniques in generating personalized programming examples for computational physics education, enhancing comprehension of theoretical concepts, and facilitating the development of practical programming skills.
References
Caballero, M. D., Kohlmyer, M. A., & Schatz, M. F. (2012). Implementing and assessing computational modeling in introductory mechanics. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 8(2), 020106.
Barak, M., Waks, S., & Doppelt, Y. (2000). Majoring in technology studies at high school and fostering learning. Learning Environments Research, 2(3), 285-304.
Qian, Y., & Lehman, J. (2017). Students' misconceptions and other difficulties in introductory programming: A literature review. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 18(1), 1-24.
Hwang, G. J., Lai, C. L., & Wang, S. Y. (2015). Seamless flipped learning: a mobile technology-enhanced flipped classroom with effective learning strategies. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(4), 449-473.
Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E., & Wieman, C. (2011). Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science, 332(6031), 862-864.
Xu, D., Huang, W., Wang, H., & Heales, J. (2014). Enhancing e-learning effectiveness using an intelligent agent-supported personalized virtual learning environment: An empirical investigation. Information & Management, 51(4), 430-440.
Lye, S. Y., & Koh, J. H. L. (2014). Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12?. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 51-61.
Dori, Y. J., & Belcher, J. (2005). How does technology-enabled active learning affect undergraduate students' understanding of electromagnetism concepts?. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 243-279.
Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012, April). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 2012 annual meeting of the American educational research association, Vancouver, Canada (Vol. 1, p. 25).
Mitrovic, A., Martin, B., & Suraweera, P. (2007). Intelligent tutors for all: The constraint-based approach. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 22(4), 38-45.
Guzdial, M. (2004). Programming environments for novices. Computer science education research, 2004, 127-154.
Pardo, A., Jovanovic, J., Dawson, S., Gašević, D., & Mirriahi, N. (2019). Using learning analytics to scale the provision of personalised feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 197-211.
