Training on Developing CPS Learning Models Using REACT for Science Teachers in Southeast Maluku Regency
DOI:
10.29303/ujcs.v5i3.687Published:
2024-09-30Issue:
Vol. 5 No. 3 (2024): SeptemberKeywords:
Creative Problem Solving, REACT, Science LearningArticles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This community service program (PKM) has the aim of implementing the development of a creative problem solving (CPS) learning model using...Relating, Experiencing, Applying, Cooperating, Transferring(REACT) in science learning that is produced towards aspects of improving student achievement, support for the implementation of junior high school science teacher duties, especially in student-oriented learning design in combining theory and practice, implementing practicums and evaluating science learning outcomes in Southeast Maluku Regency. The expected benefits in this PKM are to motivate teachers to be creative in designing and preparing learning devices in the classroom and laboratory that are oriented towards students based on the environment, so that the learning process can take place properly. While for students, it can provide a clear understanding of the material presented by the teacher, so that students are able to find explanations and provide responses to what they are learning. In addition, students are trained to find out for themselves what they observe and try to describe the concept through student worksheets prepared with the help of the CPS learning model using REACT. Therefore, the CPS learning model using REACT in science learning that is designed is collaborated with several methods, namely reflective lectures, discovery, inquiry, demonstrations and questions and answers and recitations to express various concepts that are being studied in class and can be applied in everyday life
References
Abidin, D., Retnaningrum, E., Parinussa, J. D., Kuning, D. S., Manoppo, Y., & Kartika, I. M. (2023). Curriculum development in indonesia from a historical perspective. Journal of Education Research, 4(2), 443–451. https://jer.or.id/index.php/jer/article/view/175
Bourn, D. (2016). Teachers as agents of social change. International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning, 7(3), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.18546/ijdegl.07.3.05
Canuto, P. P., Choycawen, M., & Pagdawan, R. (2024). The influence of teaching competencies on teachers’ performance and students’ academic achievement in primary science education. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 82(1), 29–47. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/24.82.29
Chomiak-Orsa, I., Grenczuk, A., Luczak, K., & Smolag, K. (2023). Application of creative problem-solving methods in remote learning. Bibliometric analysis. Procedia Computer Science, 225, 3565–3574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.10.352
Eladl, A. M., & Polpol, Y. S. (2020). the Effect of Self-Regulated learning strategies on developing creative problem solving and academic self-efficacy among intellectually superior high school students. International Journal of Psycho-Educational Sciences |, 9(1), 97–106. https://www.journals.lapub.co.uk/index.php/IJPES
Eschleman, K. J., Madsen, J., Alarcon, G., & Barelka, A. (2014). Benefiting from creative activity: The positive relationships between creative activity, recovery experiences, and performance-related outcomes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(3), 579–598. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12064
Fathonah, S., Cahyono, E., Iswari, R. S., Haryani, S., Sarwi, S., Lestari, N. H., & Kadarwati, S. (2023). Effects of multirepresentation-based creative problem-solving learning model on students’ critical thinking and diet nutritional quality. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 20(4), 669–694. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2023.038
Ghanizadeh, A. (2017). The interplay between reflective thinking, critical thinking, self-monitoring, and academic achievement in higher education. Higher Education, 74(1), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0031-y
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
Harlen, W. (1997). Primary teachers’ understanding in science and its impact in the classroom. Research in Science Education, 27(3), 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461757
Hu, R., Xiaohui, S., & Shieh, C. J. (2017). A study on the application of creative problem solving teaching to statistics teaching. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3139–3149. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00708a
Kartikasari, I. A., Usodo, B., & Riyadi. (2022). The effectiveness open-ended learning and creative problem solving models to teach creative thinking skills. Pegem Egitim ve Ogretim Dergisi, 12(4), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.04.04
Keiler, L. S. (2018). Teachers’ roles and identities in student-centered classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0131-6
Leite, L. O., Go, W., & Havu-Nuutinen, S. (2022). Exploring the learning process of experienced teachers focused on building positive interactions with pupils. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1833237
Montag-Smit, T., & Maertz, C. P. (2017). Searching outside the box in creative problem solving: The role of creative thinking skills and domain knowledge. Journal of Business Research, 81, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.07.021
Nairz-Wirth, E., & Feldmann, K. (2019). Teacher professionalism in a double field structure. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 40(6), 795–808. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2019.1597681
Noh, J., & Lee, J. (2020). Effects of robotics programming on the computational thinking and creativity of elementary school students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 463–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09708-w
Padillo, G. G., Manguilimotan, R. P., Capuno, R. G., & Espina, R. C. (2021). Professional development activities and teacher performance. International Journal of Education and Practice, 9(3), 497–506. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2021.93.497.506
Park, Y., & Green, J. (2019). Review bringing computational thinking into science education in the 21 century. Journal of The Korean Earth Science Society, 40(4), [1] M. L. Wu, “Making Sense of Digital Game-Based.
Qassem Farhang. (2023). Lesson plan and its importance in teaching process. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 06(08), 5901–5913. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/v6-i8-57
Rubenstein, L. D. V., McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2013). Teaching for creativity scales: an instrument to examine teachers’ perceptions of factors that allow for the teaching of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 25(3), 324–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.813807
Saleem, S., Burns, S., & Perlman, M. (2024). Cultivating young minds: Exploring the relationship between child socio-emotional competence, early childhood education and care quality, creativity and self-directed learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 111, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102440
Samson, P. L. (2015). Fostering student engagement: creative problem-solving in small group facilitations. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 8, 153–164. https://doi.org/10.22329/celt.v8i0.4227
Soeharto, S., Subasi Singh, S., & Afriyanti, F. (2024). Associations between attitudes toward inclusive education and teaching for creativity for Indonesian pre-service teachers. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51, 101469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101469
Van Hooijdonk, M., Mainhard, T., Kroesbergen, E. H., & Van Tartwijk, J. (2023). Creative problem solving in primary school students. Learning and Instruction, 88, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101823
Vantassel-baska, J., & Stambaugh, T. (2005). Gifted learners in the regular classroom. Theory Into Practice, 44(3), 211–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4403
Wartono, W., Diantoro, M., & Bartlolona, J. R. (2018). Influence of problem based learning learning model on student creative thinking on elasticity topics a material. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 14(1), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v14i1.10654
Wenno, I. H. (2021). The effect of problem based learning model on creative and critical thinking skills in static fluid topics. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 9(3), 498–511. https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2019.4.5256
Author Biographies
David Tuhurima, Universitas Pattimura
Izaak Hendrik Wenno, Pattimura University
Seska Malawau, Pattimura University
Ashari Bayu Dulhasyim, Pattimura University
License
Copyright (c) 2024 David Tuhurima, Izaak Hendrik Wenno, Seska Malawau, Ashari Bayu Dulhasyim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
