Optimizing the Development of P5 Worksheets for Teachers: Shaping Student Character at SMAN 1 Terara, East Lombok Regency
DOI:
10.29303/ujcs.v5i2.632Published:
2024-06-07Issue:
Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): JuneArticles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
Character education through the implementation of P5 (Projek Penguatan Profil Pelajar Pancasila) is an important initiative in the Indonesian education system to form students with integrity and national insight. This research aims to optimize the development of the P5 Worksheet for teachers at SMAN 1 Terara, East Lombok Regency, with a focus on building student character. Evaluation is carried out based on the responses of training participants regarding various aspects of material delivery and the abilities of the presenters. The results showed that the majority of participants (50) strongly agreed that the material was delivered well, while 15 participants agreed. The delivery of P5 integration was considered interesting by 44 participants who strongly agreed and 21 participants who agreed. The material was considered easy to understand by 48 participants who strongly agreed and 17 participants who agreed. Apart from that, the presenters were considered capable of creating creativity in the participants, with 47 participants strongly agreeing and 18 participants agreeing. There were no participants who gave responses that disagreed or disagreed with all aspects assessed. Overall, the results of this research show that the development of the P5 Worksheet is effective in improving the quality of learning and shaping student character in accordance with the Pancasila Student Profile
References
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context. Westview Press.
Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2010). Nurturing creativity in the classroom. Cambridge University Press.
Brown, A., & Jones, C. (2023). Assessing Training Impact: Perspectives from Participants. Training and Development Journal, 30(4), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/12170-016
Gagné, R. M., Wager, W. W., Golas, K. C., & Keller, J. M. (2005). Principles of Instructional Design. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
Garcia, M., & Martinez, L. (2023). Understanding Participant Satisfaction in Training Programs: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Applied Training, 12(1), 78–92.
Goldstein, I. L., & Ford, J. K. (2002). Training in Organizations: Needs Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
Hidayati, A., Ibrahim, I., Asri, D., Imelda, I., & Wati, I. P. (2024). Implementasi P5 (Proyek Penguatan Profil Pelajar Pancasila) Di Mi Ikhlasiyah Palembang. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Pendidikan Agama Islam, 2(3), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.61132/jmpai.v2i3.199
Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Lee, S., & Kim, H. (2022). Participant Responses to Training Delivery and Instructor Competence: A Case Study Analysis. International Journal of Training and Development, 26(3), 289–305.
Mulyasa. (2023). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka. Bumi Aksara.
Noe, R. A. (2010). Employee Training and Development. McGraw-Hill Education.
Patriana, W. D., Sutama, S., & Wulandari, M. D. (2021). Pembudayaan Literasi Numerasi untuk Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum dalam Kegiatan Kurikuler pada Sekolah Dasar Muhammadiyah. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(5), 3413–3430. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i5.1302
Phillips, J. J. (1997). Handbook of Training Evaluation and Measurement Methods. Routledge.
Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). Instructional-design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sadewa, M. A. (2022). Meninjau Kurikulum prototipe melalui pendekatan integrasi-interkoneksi Prof M Amin Abdullah. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling (JPDK), 4(1), 266–280. https://doi.org/10.31004/jpdk.v4i1.3560
Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012). The Science of Training and Development in Organizations: What Matters in Practice. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Supplement, 13(2), 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612436661
Smith, J., & Johnson, R. (2022). Evaluating Training Effectiveness: A Comprehensive Approach. Journal of Human Resource Development, 15(2), 102–118.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7
Author Biographies
Susilawati, University of Mataram
Aris Doyan, University of Mataram
Ahmad Busyairi, University of Mataram
Syahrial Ayub, University of Mataram
Nina Nisrina, University of Mataram
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Susilawati, Aris Doyan, Ahmad Busyairi, Syahrial Ayub, Nina Nisrina
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
