Pelatihan Pengembangan Instrumen Asesmen Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Bagi MGMP IPA Kabupaten Ogan Ilir
DOI:
10.29303/ujcs.v3i2.195Published:
2022-06-23Downloads
Abstract
Assessment requires not only knowledge but also skills. Meanwhile, not all science teachers in Ogan Ilir understand and receive training on how to assess the desired assessment in the curriculum, especially assessments for higher-order thinking skills. The purpose of this community service activity is for participants to be able to develop higher-level thinking assessment instruments for science learning in junior high schools. The activity was packaged in the form of training which was attended by 22 people from the Ogan Ilir Regency IPA MGMP. Training is carried out with an in-service training (in) - on the job training (on) - in-service training (in) pattern. In the in-service training activity, 1 participant studied and discussed the material presented by the resource person. During on the job training, participants carry out learning activities independently to develop assessment instruments according to the tasks given in in-service training activities 1. In in-service training activity 2, participants reported and discussed the results of activities carried out during on the job training facilitated by the resource persons. The results of the training showed that participants were able to develop assessment instruments. A number of obstacles were encountered in this training. In the process aspect, the main obstacle faced is limited interaction due to the implementation of health protocols due to the Covid-19 pandemic. In the aspect of implementing training results, the main obstacle is the lack of mutual understanding of the importance of training learners to think at a higher level.Keywords:
Assessment literacy High thinking level Science learningReferences
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Addison Wesley Longman.
Bakri, F., & Raharjo, S. B. (2015). Analisis hasil uji kompetensi guru fisika. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 1(1), 91–96.
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain (B. S. Bloom (Ed.)). David McKay.
Gaible, E., & Burns, M. (2005). Using technology to train teachers: Appropriate uses of ICT for teacher professional development in developing countries. infoDev / World Bank. http://www.infodev.org/en/Publication.13.html
Karaoğlan-Yilmaz, F. G. (2020). Investigation of pre-service teachers’ opinions on advantages and disadvantages of online formative assessment: An example of online multiple-choice exam. 2(June), 10–19.
Koh, K. H. (2011). Improving teachers’ assessment literacy through professional development. Teaching Education, 22(3), 255–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2011.593164
Lian, L. H., Yew, W. T., & Meng, C. C. (2014). Enhancing Malaysian teachers’ assessment literacy. International Education Studies, 7(10), 74–81. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n10p74
Plake, B. S. (1993). Teacher assessment literacy: Teacher’s competencies in the educational assessment studen. Mid-Western Educational Research, 6(1), 21–27.
Sato, M., Wei, R. C., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Improving teachers’ assessment practices through professional development: The Ccse of national board certification. American Educational Research Journal, 45(3), 669–700. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208316955
Stiggins, R. J. (1991). Assssment literacy. Phi Delta Kappan, 72(7), 534–539.
Stiggins, R. J., Frisbie, D. A., & Griswold, P. A. (1989). Inside high school grading practices: Building a research agenda. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 8(2), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1989.tb00315.x
Wilson, D. M., & Narasuman, S. (2020). Investigating teachers’ implementation and strategies on higher order thinking skills in school based assessment instruments. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(1), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i1.8991
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Muhamad Yusup, Abidin Pasaribu, Syuhendri Syuhendri, Anisha Sherany Thamrin, Riska Anggraini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
